Is State Tax Rates Hiking Up THE PRICE TAG ON Vaporizers?

vaping online

Is State Tax Rates Hiking Up THE PRICE TAG ON Vaporizers?

The U.S. tobacco industry is fighting back against efforts by state regulatory bodies and consumers to regulate the sale of electric cigarettes. While vaporizers have been around for quite some time and are becoming more acceptable in mainstream American life, the tobacco companies are determined to fight these efforts vigorously. They’ve made millions of dollars attempting to defeat state taxing and regulation efforts. Now, they’re making their next move: challenging the legality of the taxation themselves. In a fresh legal filing, they’re claiming that the FDA over regulates and creates a “guaranteed” interstate transportation business. The filing is currently being contested in the courts, and Puff Bar Flavors both sides expect an answer at some point soon.

State taxation uprights vaporizers by regulating their sale. It’s estimated that about twenty states have uprights to sell vaporizer devices, including California, Colorado, D.C., Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Washington. These states have grown rapidly in recent years, so when a consequence, their cigarette tax rates may also be growing rapidly. Many of these same states also have placed taxes on cigar and pipe tobacco. It seems that smoking just gets more expensive, and that is what the tobacco industry is shooting for.

In line with the filing with the FDA, the tobacco industry has been targeted unfairly. The tobacco industry is doing everything they can to fight regulation of vaporizer devices. As we’ve seen, the U.S. Supreme Court has multiple times ruled contrary to the FDA over-regulation of cigarettes. These rulings have left the door spacious to regulation of vaporizer devices. The FDA claims that over-regulation defeats the objective of regulating and controlling the usage of vaporizers.

The fact is that the FDA itself is not even necessary to regulate or control these industries. Only state governments have that authority. It is the state governments that impose their own taxes, and many states have imposed increased taxes in order to try to curb smoking. However the state governments are themselves at a disadvantage. They can not regulate wholesale prices since these prices are regulated by state laws. They also can’t tax the product at a higher rate than the authorities does.

Also, the FDA itself is not directly involved in the manufacturing of the vaporizer. Tobacco companies manufacture their very own products, and they are the ones that get sued by the states and levied taxes. The FDA merely approves or denies manufacturer licenses based upon whether these manufacturers follow federal law. And when the manufacturer doesn’t, then the company doesn’t get its license.

So, the states that impose taxes on vaporizer devices don’t get the benefit of having a federal regulator, or a manufacturer that is licensed by hawaii. So, instead, they find ways to increase taxes on the manufactures themselves! Which makes no sense. Why are these manufacturers being targeted specifically? There’s no real reason.

The Food and Drug Administration is the federal body responsible for regulating pharmaceuticals, dietary supplements and cosmetics. It gets the capacity to ban the production or sale of any chemical or substance that it determines is unsafe. So, why are states trying to tell the FDA to target Vaping online users rather than tobacco manufacturers? The FDA knows that regulating weight loss supplements isn’t likely to work because there are no controlled diet pills currently available to buy. And, even if there have been, they couldn’t force food manufacturers to market diet pills containing things that are banned by state law.

So, instead, the states are trying to force the FDA to come up with some kind of rule or regulation which will require a manufacturer to sell their devices in a particular manner, according to state regulations. That makes no sense at all. In addition, it flies in the face of the original purpose of the meals Drug and Administration Act. Why the FDA is targeting the unit is really a question that only experts in the FDA can answer.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.